![]() But for me, the Les Paul has more ballsy power when playing riffs and power chords. ![]() Obviously, depending on your humbuckers, hardware, pedal, pick, amp, and technique were all going to sound different. Although people say they are very similar when it comes to playing rock music, I’m not so sure. This is all down to the individual design of each guitar. The build design of a Les Paul gives you better resonance. Les Paul guitars have pumped out some of the most unique amazing tones ever heard. If you’re thinking of playing something a little more intricate, skillful and beautiful, then, in my opinion, you’d get a lot more clarity on an SG.ĭon’t be put off by the thicker, stocky heavyweight body of a Les Paul. This is where the SG and Les Paul are extremely distinctive. Especially in the mid to high end spectrum. On the flip side to this, the SG possesses a sharp-edged, brighter raw growl. The Les Paul also has a superior warmth throughout that deep low end, where the SG‘s ‘mid range’ low tones are excellent. Don’t be confused by the two descriptions. ![]() That being said, a Les Pauls‘s strength is its ability to dig into some of the best low end tones you’ll get on any electric guitar. The lightweight narrow-type body of the SG allows for a stronger bottom end at ‘mid range’ chords. Yet we do know that the following is true when comparing the Gibson Les Paul Vs SG: It’s impossible to pick exact tonal characteristics between the two guitars. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |